AMBER CHARTER SCHOOL EAST HARLEM GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

97

48%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

44

42%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

53

49%

LEVEL 4

24

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

45

48%

LEVEL 3

36

38%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

44

46%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

49

39%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

70

51%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

73

45%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

84

50%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

20

57%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

13

38%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

20

54%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

68

40%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

77

46%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.