Skip to Content
Main content

PS 166 RICHARD ROGERS-ARTS & SCI GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

38

14%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

119

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

22

8%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

144

54%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

65

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

77

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

58

41%

LEVEL 4

54

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

46

35%

LEVEL 4

67

51%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

15

68%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

21

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

27

79%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

61

40%

LEVEL 4

74

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

57

36%

LEVEL 4

91

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

82

36%

LEVEL 4

118

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

138

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

115

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

135

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

21

39%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.