AKRON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

75

19%

LEVEL 2

138

34%

LEVEL 3

122

30%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

119

31%

LEVEL 4

77

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

65

33%

LEVEL 4

56

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

25

50%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

17

37%

LEVEL 2

20

43%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

104

32%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

66

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

77

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

32

78%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

80

36%

LEVEL 4

60

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

44

33%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.