HOMER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

117

33%

LEVEL 2

139

40%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

100

27%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

45

30%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

72

36%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

66

34%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

114

33%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

104

29%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

129

41%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

76

23%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

26

67%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

34

72%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

69

49%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

70

47%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.