CHENANGO FORKS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

169

28%

LEVEL 2

226

37%

LEVEL 3

146

24%

LEVEL 4

66

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

159

26%

LEVEL 2

201

33%

LEVEL 3

161

27%

LEVEL 4

82

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

71

25%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

98

30%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

149

27%

LEVEL 2

209

38%

LEVEL 3

139

25%

LEVEL 4

60

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

145

26%

LEVEL 2

185

33%

LEVEL 3

151

27%

LEVEL 4

75

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

114

21%

LEVEL 2

207

39%

LEVEL 3

145

27%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

105

20%

LEVEL 2

181

34%

LEVEL 3

157

30%

LEVEL 4

82

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

55

73%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

54

69%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

68

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

108

41%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

94

35%

LEVEL 2

99

37%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.