Skip to Content
Main content

HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY EAST CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

92

26%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

118

38%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

40

22%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

68

38%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

68

40%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

96
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

47

39%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

107

38%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

107

44%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

39

52%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

32

47%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

12

25%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.