Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER-HARLEM 1 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

475
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

106

18%

LEVEL 3

324

55%

LEVEL 4

151

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

456
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

58

11%

LEVEL 3

281

54%

LEVEL 4

175

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

236
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

143

49%

LEVEL 4

93

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

232
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

126

49%

LEVEL 4

106

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

239
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

51

17%

LEVEL 3

181

61%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

224
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

34

13%

LEVEL 3

155

59%

LEVEL 4

69

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

19
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

12

50%

LEVEL 4

7

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

350
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

77

18%

LEVEL 3

241

56%

LEVEL 4

109

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

320
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

38

10%

LEVEL 3

199

55%

LEVEL 4

121

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

61

54%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

66

57%

LEVEL 4

34

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

403
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

72

15%

LEVEL 3

262

55%

LEVEL 4

141

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

35

9%

LEVEL 3

218

53%

LEVEL 4

158

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

72
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

62

54%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

80
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

63

58%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

468
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

103

18%

LEVEL 3

318

55%

LEVEL 4

150

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

446
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

57

11%

LEVEL 3

274

54%

LEVEL 4

172

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

76

48%

LEVEL 4

59

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

50

56%

LEVEL 4

34

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

340
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

87

20%

LEVEL 3

248

57%

LEVEL 4

92

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

372
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

54

13%

LEVEL 3

231

54%

LEVEL 4

141

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.