GASKILL PREPARATORY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

185

42%

LEVEL 2

167

38%

LEVEL 3

63

14%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

178

41%

LEVEL 2

171

39%

LEVEL 3

69

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

78

38%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

73

34%

LEVEL 2

92

43%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

107

45%

LEVEL 2

93

39%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

105

48%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

23

45%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

59

41%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

38

30%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

112

53%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

105

50%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

15

52%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

129

36%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

128

35%

LEVEL 2

151

42%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

56

70%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

50

69%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

164

47%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

164

45%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.