AMANI PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

143

45%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

101

30%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

36

26%

LEVEL 2

58

42%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

70

38%

LEVEL 2

85

46%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

68

36%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

60
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

94

34%

LEVEL 2

122

44%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

106
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

89

28%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

31

33%

LEVEL 2

45

48%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

75

33%

LEVEL 2

98

43%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

87

34%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.