YATES COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 781

LEVEL 1

203

26%

LEVEL 2

300

38%

LEVEL 3

197

25%

LEVEL 4

81

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 792

LEVEL 1

229

29%

LEVEL 2

298

38%

LEVEL 3

183

23%

LEVEL 4

82

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

94

25%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

133

32%

LEVEL 2

165

40%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

135

33%

LEVEL 2

171

41%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

254
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 723

LEVEL 1

189

26%

LEVEL 2

280

39%

LEVEL 3

184

25%

LEVEL 4

70

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

251
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

212

29%

LEVEL 2

271

37%

LEVEL 3

176

24%

LEVEL 4

75

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

120

19%

LEVEL 2

261

40%

LEVEL 3

187

29%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

147

22%

LEVEL 2

265

39%

LEVEL 3

180

27%

LEVEL 4

81

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

83

62%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

82

69%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

50

16%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

153

33%

LEVEL 2

185

39%

LEVEL 3

105

22%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

170

37%

LEVEL 2

180

39%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

265
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

227

29%

LEVEL 2

295

37%

LEVEL 3

183

23%

LEVEL 4

82

10%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

277
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

198

26%

LEVEL 2

298

39%

LEVEL 3

196

25%

LEVEL 4

81

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

262
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

222

29%

LEVEL 2

293

38%

LEVEL 3

181

23%

LEVEL 4

81

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.