Skip to Content
Main content

INDIAN LANDING ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

77

38%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

92

43%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

41

47%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

41

47%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

51

40%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

78

45%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

77

41%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

89

44%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

64

42%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

81

48%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

20

44%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.