Skip to Content
Main content

ENRICO FERMI SCHOOL-PERF ARTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

327

54%

LEVEL 2

179

30%

LEVEL 3

80

13%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

295

48%

LEVEL 2

179

29%

LEVEL 3

108

18%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

134

44%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

129

41%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

193

64%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

166

55%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

24

50%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

22

49%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

291

55%

LEVEL 2

152

29%

LEVEL 3

70

13%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

262

48%

LEVEL 2

160

29%

LEVEL 3

93

17%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

291

52%

LEVEL 2

169

30%

LEVEL 3

80

14%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

255

45%

LEVEL 2

172

30%

LEVEL 3

107

19%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

36

78%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

40

83%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

111

32%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

134
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

216

83%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

5

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

211

78%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

9

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

319

54%

LEVEL 2

173

29%

LEVEL 3

78

13%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

284

48%

LEVEL 2

172

29%

LEVEL 3

104

18%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

99
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

324

54%

LEVEL 2

176

29%

LEVEL 3

80

13%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

289

48%

LEVEL 2

176

29%

LEVEL 3

107

18%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.