SCARSDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

820
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,018

LEVEL 1

38

4%

LEVEL 2

160

16%

LEVEL 3

376

37%

LEVEL 4

444

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

837
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,001

LEVEL 1

34

3%

LEVEL 2

130

13%

LEVEL 3

322

32%

LEVEL 4

515

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

414
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

59

12%

LEVEL 3

167

35%

LEVEL 4

247

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

427
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

49

10%

LEVEL 3

150

31%

LEVEL 4

277

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

406
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

101

19%

LEVEL 3

209

39%

LEVEL 4

197

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

410
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

81

16%

LEVEL 3

172

34%

LEVEL 4

238

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

45
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

27

45%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

57
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

41

64%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

184
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

115

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

207
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

9%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

149

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

527
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

22

3%

LEVEL 2

114

17%

LEVEL 3

254

38%

LEVEL 4

273

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

519
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

86

14%

LEVEL 3

228

36%

LEVEL 4

291

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

29

43%

LEVEL 4

25

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

30

52%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

802
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 954

LEVEL 1

17

2%

LEVEL 2

135

14%

LEVEL 3

360

38%

LEVEL 4

442

46%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

816
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 938

LEVEL 1

17

2%

LEVEL 2

105

11%

LEVEL 3

309

33%

LEVEL 4

507

54%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

25

39%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

817
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,009

LEVEL 1

37

4%

LEVEL 2

155

15%

LEVEL 3

374

37%

LEVEL 4

443

44%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.