WILLIAM B WARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

166

40%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

181

42%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

100

50%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

103

47%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

78

38%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

77

48%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

96

54%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

24

29%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

15

20%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

29

39%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

32

24%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

54

37%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

105

28%

LEVEL 3

164

44%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

173

44%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

214
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

161

42%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

245
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

48

12%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

178

44%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

127

47%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

75

26%

LEVEL 3

138

47%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

36

26%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

38

29%

LEVEL 2

44

33%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

219
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

166

41%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

247
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

57

14%

LEVEL 2

117

28%

LEVEL 3

180

43%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.