TRINITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

116

33%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

77

24%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

111

34%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

70

42%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

62

41%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

53

29%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

17

41%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

17

50%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

22

22%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

36

37%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

19

21%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

35

38%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

43

27%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

113

37%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

110

38%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

25

66%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

136
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

115

37%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

123
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

105

38%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

22

65%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

26

59%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

56

47%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

55

45%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

64

28%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.