GREENBURGH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 746

LEVEL 1

205

27%

LEVEL 2

269

36%

LEVEL 3

171

23%

LEVEL 4

101

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

210

30%

LEVEL 2

203

29%

LEVEL 3

188

27%

LEVEL 4

100

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

145

37%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

109

30%

LEVEL 2

104

28%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

115

32%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

101

30%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

22

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

28

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

86
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

97

37%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

86

29%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

74

25%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

117
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

115

19%

LEVEL 2

234

38%

LEVEL 3

159

26%

LEVEL 4

100

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

127

22%

LEVEL 2

183

31%

LEVEL 3

180

31%

LEVEL 4

100

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

90

65%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

83

75%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

268
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

167

24%

LEVEL 2

247

36%

LEVEL 3

167

24%

LEVEL 4

101

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

285
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

179

27%

LEVEL 2

187

29%

LEVEL 3

185

28%

LEVEL 4

100

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

38

59%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

31

62%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

56

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

153

32%

LEVEL 2

194

41%

LEVEL 3

89

19%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

162

35%

LEVEL 2

151

32%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

272
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

199

27%

LEVEL 2

263

36%

LEVEL 3

171

23%

LEVEL 4

101

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

286
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

205

30%

LEVEL 2

197

29%

LEVEL 3

187

27%

LEVEL 4

99

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.