Skip to Content
Main content

BRONXVILLE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

603
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 752

LEVEL 1

28

4%

LEVEL 2

121

16%

LEVEL 3

330

44%

LEVEL 4

273

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

619
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 751

LEVEL 1

34

5%

LEVEL 2

98

13%

LEVEL 3

301

40%

LEVEL 4

318

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

314
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

36

10%

LEVEL 3

146

41%

LEVEL 4

168

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

305
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

35

10%

LEVEL 3

137

39%

LEVEL 4

168

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

289
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

184

47%

LEVEL 4

105

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

314
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

63

16%

LEVEL 3

164

41%

LEVEL 4

150

37%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

40
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

24

50%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

41
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

18

36%

LEVEL 4

23

46%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

21

39%

LEVEL 4

21

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

490
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

96

16%

LEVEL 3

264

43%

LEVEL 4

226

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

493
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

29

5%

LEVEL 2

78

13%

LEVEL 3

241

40%

LEVEL 4

252

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

25

49%

LEVEL 4

17

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

594
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

15

2%

LEVEL 2

105

15%

LEVEL 3

323

45%

LEVEL 4

271

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

607
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 712

LEVEL 1

21

3%

LEVEL 2

84

12%

LEVEL 3

290

41%

LEVEL 4

317

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

13

34%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

597
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 744

LEVEL 1

28

4%

LEVEL 2

119

16%

LEVEL 3

325

44%

LEVEL 4

272

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

611
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

33

4%

LEVEL 2

97

13%

LEVEL 3

296

40%

LEVEL 4

315

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.