Skip to Content
Main content

HENDRICK HUDSON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

386
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 811

LEVEL 1

168

21%

LEVEL 2

257

32%

LEVEL 3

274

34%

LEVEL 4

112

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

384
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 805

LEVEL 1

171

21%

LEVEL 2

250

31%

LEVEL 3

262

33%

LEVEL 4

122

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

232
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

118

28%

LEVEL 3

156

38%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

69

17%

LEVEL 2

102

25%

LEVEL 3

152

38%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

102

26%

LEVEL 2

139

35%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

153
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

102

25%

LEVEL 2

148

37%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

14

32%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

250
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

67

15%

LEVEL 2

136

30%

LEVEL 3

181

40%

LEVEL 4

69

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

256
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

133

29%

LEVEL 3

167

37%

LEVEL 4

89

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

20

41%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

19

37%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

69

31%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

78

34%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

383
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 724

LEVEL 1

106

15%

LEVEL 2

235

32%

LEVEL 3

271

37%

LEVEL 4

112

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

379
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 721

LEVEL 1

110

15%

LEVEL 2

232

32%

LEVEL 3

257

36%

LEVEL 4

122

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

62

71%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

61

73%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

386
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 784

LEVEL 1

149

19%

LEVEL 2

249

32%

LEVEL 3

274

35%

LEVEL 4

112

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

384
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 779

LEVEL 1

148

19%

LEVEL 2

247

32%

LEVEL 3

262

34%

LEVEL 4

122

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

19

70%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

23

88%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

324
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

82

15%

LEVEL 2

146

26%

LEVEL 3

227

41%

LEVEL 4

97

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

327
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

165

29%

LEVEL 3

223

39%

LEVEL 4

104

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

86

33%

LEVEL 2

111

43%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

98

41%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

386
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 805

LEVEL 1

163

20%

LEVEL 2

256

32%

LEVEL 3

274

34%

LEVEL 4

112

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.