JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

468
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

33

5%

LEVEL 2

117

19%

LEVEL 3

242

39%

LEVEL 4

226

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

445
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

108

18%

LEVEL 3

198

33%

LEVEL 4

247

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

246
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

115

38%

LEVEL 4

131

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

225
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

45

16%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

140

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

222
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

74

23%

LEVEL 3

127

40%

LEVEL 4

95

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

220
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

113

36%

LEVEL 4

107

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

16

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

13

45%

LEVEL 4

13

45%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

11

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

396
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

97

19%

LEVEL 3

205

39%

LEVEL 4

191

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

366
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

87

18%

LEVEL 3

170

35%

LEVEL 4

196

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

13

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

23

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

440
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

74

14%

LEVEL 3

223

43%

LEVEL 4

217

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

421
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

74

15%

LEVEL 3

183

36%

LEVEL 4

238

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

24

25%

LEVEL 2

43

45%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

444
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

28

5%

LEVEL 2

112

19%

LEVEL 3

227

39%

LEVEL 4

217

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

420
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

101

18%

LEVEL 3

187

33%

LEVEL 4

233

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

15

44%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

14

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.