NORTH ROSE-WOLCOTT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

142

41%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

138

39%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

59

36%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

59

33%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

83

45%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

79

44%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

123

39%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

114

37%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

102

33%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

34

85%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

36

84%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

123

53%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

114

48%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

138

41%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

130

38%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.