QUEENSBURY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

93

15%

LEVEL 2

168

27%

LEVEL 3

180

29%

LEVEL 4

174

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

105

18%

LEVEL 2

174

30%

LEVEL 3

173

30%

LEVEL 4

133

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

70

24%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

103

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

71

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

71

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

153
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

64

21%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

336
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

84

15%

LEVEL 2

156

27%

LEVEL 3

172

30%

LEVEL 4

164

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

293
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

100

18%

LEVEL 2

157

29%

LEVEL 3

167

30%

LEVEL 4

126

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

7

78%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

348
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

175

33%

LEVEL 4

173

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

147

30%

LEVEL 3

170

34%

LEVEL 4

133

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

51

57%

LEVEL 2

33

37%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

57

66%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

278
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

89

22%

LEVEL 3

136

33%

LEVEL 4

142

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

128

34%

LEVEL 4

108

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

65

31%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

352
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

93

15%

LEVEL 2

163

27%

LEVEL 3

179

29%

LEVEL 4

173

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

306
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

99

17%

LEVEL 2

170

30%

LEVEL 3

173

30%

LEVEL 4

133

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.