GLENS FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 827

LEVEL 1

203

25%

LEVEL 2

287

35%

LEVEL 3

247

30%

LEVEL 4

90

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 833

LEVEL 1

215

26%

LEVEL 2

294

35%

LEVEL 3

210

25%

LEVEL 4

114

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

85

21%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

139

34%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

83

20%

LEVEL 2

143

34%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

118

28%

LEVEL 2

149

36%

LEVEL 3

108

26%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

132

32%

LEVEL 2

151

36%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

15

27%

LEVEL 2

24

44%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

295
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 709

LEVEL 1

173

24%

LEVEL 2

241

34%

LEVEL 3

215

30%

LEVEL 4

80

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

291
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 716

LEVEL 1

177

25%

LEVEL 2

248

35%

LEVEL 3

190

27%

LEVEL 4

101

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

21

49%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

119

17%

LEVEL 2

249

36%

LEVEL 3

240

34%

LEVEL 4

90

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

317
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

121

18%

LEVEL 2

250

36%

LEVEL 3

205

30%

LEVEL 4

112

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

84

65%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

94

65%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

135

32%

LEVEL 3

157

37%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

67

16%

LEVEL 2

144

34%

LEVEL 3

138

32%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

139

34%

LEVEL 2

152

37%

LEVEL 3

90

22%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

148

36%

LEVEL 2

150

37%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

333
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 796

LEVEL 1

186

23%

LEVEL 2

277

35%

LEVEL 3

243

31%

LEVEL 4

90

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

318
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 810

LEVEL 1

206

25%

LEVEL 2

286

35%

LEVEL 3

204

25%

LEVEL 4

114

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.