GLENS FALLS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

161

30%

LEVEL 2

177

33%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

168

30%

LEVEL 2

186

33%

LEVEL 3

119

21%

LEVEL 4

88

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

68

24%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

100

35%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

16

50%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

136

30%

LEVEL 2

149

33%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

138

29%

LEVEL 2

155

32%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

77

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

94

21%

LEVEL 2

162

36%

LEVEL 3

124

28%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

95

21%

LEVEL 2

163

35%

LEVEL 3

118

25%

LEVEL 4

87

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

67

80%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

73

74%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

57

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

107

41%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

109

41%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

190
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

145

28%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

125

25%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

205
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

161

29%

LEVEL 2

181

33%

LEVEL 3

117

21%

LEVEL 4

88

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

16

80%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.