ELLENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

266

44%

LEVEL 2

214

36%

LEVEL 3

100

17%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

269

45%

LEVEL 2

180

30%

LEVEL 3

117

20%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

100

35%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

105

37%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

166

53%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

164

53%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

103

40%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

100

40%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

30

49%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

31

53%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

118

49%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

127

51%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

176

36%

LEVEL 2

194

39%

LEVEL 3

100

20%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

170

36%

LEVEL 2

164

34%

LEVEL 3

114

24%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

90

82%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

99

84%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

122
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

242

42%

LEVEL 2

211

37%

LEVEL 3

100

17%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

143
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

247

44%

LEVEL 2

173

31%

LEVEL 3

115

20%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

24

89%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

22

71%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

48

30%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

218

49%

LEVEL 2

160

36%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

214

50%

LEVEL 2

126

30%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

254

44%

LEVEL 2

204

35%

LEVEL 3

99

17%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

251

44%

LEVEL 2

173

31%

LEVEL 3

116

20%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

18

64%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.