Skip to Content
Main content

ELLENVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

127

39%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

134

42%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

59

36%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

62

40%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

68

42%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

72

43%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

48

35%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

67

47%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

68

52%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

77

31%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

40

71%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

57

83%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

117

37%

LEVEL 2

127

40%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

128

41%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

21

27%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

22

25%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

106

43%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

112

48%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

123

39%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

127

41%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.