LANSING CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

97

19%

LEVEL 2

153

29%

LEVEL 3

176

34%

LEVEL 4

98

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

84

16%

LEVEL 2

154

30%

LEVEL 3

168

33%

LEVEL 4

110

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

86

37%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

13

22%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

15

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

227
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

74

17%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

149

35%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

234
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

67

16%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

143

34%

LEVEL 4

91

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

7

58%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

133

29%

LEVEL 3

174

38%

LEVEL 4

98

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

140

30%

LEVEL 3

165

35%

LEVEL 4

109

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

42

66%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

31

63%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

274
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

94

18%

LEVEL 2

150

29%

LEVEL 3

176

34%

LEVEL 4

98

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

278
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

81

16%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

168

33%

LEVEL 4

110

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

140

38%

LEVEL 4

88

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

135

37%

LEVEL 4

98

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

274
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

84

16%

LEVEL 2

153

30%

LEVEL 3

165

32%

LEVEL 4

109

21%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.