BOYNTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

69

18%

LEVEL 2

94

24%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

107

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

69

18%

LEVEL 2

80

21%

LEVEL 3

108

28%

LEVEL 4

129

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

61

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

40

22%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

71

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

40

19%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

58

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

12

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

9

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

81

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

54

20%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

99

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

7

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

79

24%

LEVEL 3

111

33%

LEVEL 4

105

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

67

20%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

126

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

30

60%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

25

58%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

98

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

114

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

43

43%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

40

37%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

236
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

67

18%

LEVEL 2

78

20%

LEVEL 3

108

28%

LEVEL 4

128

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.