Skip to Content
Main content

NEWARK VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

134

30%

LEVEL 2

158

35%

LEVEL 3

116

26%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

159

34%

LEVEL 2

153

33%

LEVEL 3

118

25%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

81

37%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

102

43%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

127

30%

LEVEL 2

148

35%

LEVEL 3

109

26%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

153

35%

LEVEL 2

146

33%

LEVEL 3

113

26%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

102

26%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

114

28%

LEVEL 2

145

36%

LEVEL 3

115

28%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

45

80%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

92

42%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

113

48%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.