Skip to Content
Main content

BENJAMIN COSOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

181

47%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

169

47%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

73

40%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

108

54%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

93

55%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

40

36%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

35

35%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

29

55%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

101

53%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

90

51%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

139

41%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

128

41%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

42

88%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

41

93%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

125

39%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

129

43%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

56

88%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

40

70%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

30

30%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

26

29%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

151

54%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

143

54%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

71
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

164

46%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

79
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

152

46%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

73
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

163

45%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

78
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

161

47%

LEVEL 2

101

30%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

18

78%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.