RALPH REED SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

356

54%

LEVEL 2

192

29%

LEVEL 3

80

12%

LEVEL 4

36

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 965

LEVEL 1

406

42%

LEVEL 2

322

33%

LEVEL 3

199

21%

LEVEL 4

38

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

150

47%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

170

37%

LEVEL 2

162

35%

LEVEL 3

108

23%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

206

60%

LEVEL 2

84

25%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

236

47%

LEVEL 2

160

32%

LEVEL 3

91

18%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

16

30%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

31

32%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

47

48%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

55

35%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

289

57%

LEVEL 2

140

28%

LEVEL 3

55

11%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

148
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

318

46%

LEVEL 2

227

33%

LEVEL 3

122

18%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

294

50%

LEVEL 2

183

31%

LEVEL 3

79

13%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 870

LEVEL 1

323

37%

LEVEL 2

311

36%

LEVEL 3

198

23%

LEVEL 4

38

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

62

86%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

83

87%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

115
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

167

37%

LEVEL 2

168

37%

LEVEL 3

79

18%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

235
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

189

27%

LEVEL 2

283

40%

LEVEL 3

197

28%

LEVEL 4

38

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

189

88%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

1

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

217

84%

LEVEL 2

39

15%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

53

48%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

148

38%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

303

55%

LEVEL 2

159

29%

LEVEL 3

65

12%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

258

45%

LEVEL 2

191

33%

LEVEL 3

108

19%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

344

54%

LEVEL 2

183

29%

LEVEL 3

80

12%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

233
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 942

LEVEL 1

391

42%

LEVEL 2

318

34%

LEVEL 3

195

21%

LEVEL 4

38

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.