ISLIP UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

105

25%

LEVEL 2

161

38%

LEVEL 3

129

30%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

116

27%

LEVEL 2

159

37%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

80

40%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

81

33%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

13

36%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

35

69%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

36

57%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

87

22%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

157
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

20

69%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

85

34%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

51

21%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

67

38%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

65

35%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.