Skip to Content
Main content

FRANK P LONG INTERMEDIATE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

120

40%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

150

40%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

53

35%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

67

44%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

86

45%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

36

41%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

29

56%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

65

47%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

84

51%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

23

66%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

27

57%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

96

38%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

44

80%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

41

41%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

41

35%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

97

48%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

126

49%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

116

39%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

141

39%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.