EAST MORICHES UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

111

44%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

112

40%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

63

48%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

68

46%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

48

38%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

92

44%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

89

40%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

16

39%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

108

46%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

107

41%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

159
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

111

45%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

109

41%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

96

43%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

98

43%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

15

45%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

13

24%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.