BELLPORT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

203

59%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

195

50%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

71

44%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

79

45%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

132

71%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

116

53%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

42

36%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

36

29%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

48

71%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

41

63%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

99

72%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

103

60%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

171

56%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

145

43%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

32

80%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

50

85%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

166

54%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

86
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

158

45%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

37

97%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

37

90%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

52

37%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

151

74%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

155

62%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

192

58%

LEVEL 2

77

23%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

189

49%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.