NATHANIEL WOODHULL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

100

40%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

23

20%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

37

32%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

60

43%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

28

36%

LEVEL 3

29

37%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

32

36%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

23

26%

LEVEL 2

38

44%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

52

47%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

15

50%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

93
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

93

39%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

31

42%

LEVEL 3

28

38%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

37

41%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

51

35%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

44

27%

LEVEL 2

70

43%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.