MILTON L OLIVE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 732

LEVEL 1

363

50%

LEVEL 2

228

31%

LEVEL 3

111

15%

LEVEL 4

30

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

252

47%

LEVEL 2

163

30%

LEVEL 3

77

14%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

141

39%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

112

40%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

222

60%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

140

54%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

60
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

158

50%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

115

50%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

203

50%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

134

45%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

272

45%

LEVEL 2

196

32%

LEVEL 3

108

18%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

188

41%

LEVEL 2

144

32%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

91

72%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

64

75%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

140
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

234

40%

LEVEL 2

207

36%

LEVEL 3

110

19%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

120
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

165

39%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

129

85%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

87

75%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

347

50%

LEVEL 2

215

31%

LEVEL 3

99

14%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

236

48%

LEVEL 2

146

30%

LEVEL 3

69

14%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

138
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

342

49%

LEVEL 2

213

31%

LEVEL 3

109

16%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

119
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

239

47%

LEVEL 2

152

30%

LEVEL 3

74

15%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.