DEAUVILLE GARDENS EAST ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

75

34%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

79

37%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

42

42%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

36

28%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

37

33%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

37

33%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

14

38%

LEVEL 4

11

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

18

39%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

34

27%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

34

29%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

44

37%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

75

40%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

78

40%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

25

81%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

16

84%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

98
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

71

39%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

79

42%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

24

65%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

21

81%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

15

25%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

57

37%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

99
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

98
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

50

25%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.