GREAT NECK ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

63

26%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

44

39%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

45

36%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

42

33%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

40

33%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

15

56%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

14

27%

LEVEL 2

23

44%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

45

29%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

84

41%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

23

62%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

101
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

76

39%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

33

61%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

29

57%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

23

45%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

56

29%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

65

34%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

84

36%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.