WATERLOO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

178

39%

LEVEL 2

151

33%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

262

46%

LEVEL 2

182

32%

LEVEL 3

93

16%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

69

34%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

101

40%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

109

44%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

161

51%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

149

37%

LEVEL 2

141

35%

LEVEL 3

94

23%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

225

45%

LEVEL 2

164

32%

LEVEL 3

88

17%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

15

63%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

113

30%

LEVEL 2

141

38%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

175

37%

LEVEL 2

175

37%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

65

82%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

87

91%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

46

26%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

132

48%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

185

55%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

122
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

173

39%

LEVEL 2

144

33%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

248

45%

LEVEL 2

177

32%

LEVEL 3

92

17%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.