SCHALMONT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

142

23%

LEVEL 2

213

34%

LEVEL 3

200

32%

LEVEL 4

75

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

142

21%

LEVEL 2

214

32%

LEVEL 3

210

32%

LEVEL 4

97

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

106

36%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

50

16%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

120

37%

LEVEL 4

55

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

97

29%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

236
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

113

21%

LEVEL 2

178

34%

LEVEL 3

168

32%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

268
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

115

20%

LEVEL 2

188

33%

LEVEL 3

181

32%

LEVEL 4

87

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

14

35%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

89

16%

LEVEL 2

198

35%

LEVEL 3

198

35%

LEVEL 4

75

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

102

17%

LEVEL 2

198

33%

LEVEL 3

206

34%

LEVEL 4

95

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

53

76%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

40

65%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

144

33%

LEVEL 3

160

36%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

67

15%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

166

36%

LEVEL 4

91

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

74

39%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

75

37%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.