Skip to Content
Main content

PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

108

27%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

135

34%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

112

24%

LEVEL 2

163

36%

LEVEL 3

154

34%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

54

24%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

116

38%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

77

22%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

128

37%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

132

38%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

148

38%

LEVEL 3

152

39%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

36

75%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

48

74%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

104

27%

LEVEL 2

134

35%

LEVEL 3

133

34%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

182
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

111

25%

LEVEL 2

159

35%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

95

42%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

109

43%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

65

38%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.