Skip to Content
Main content

IROQUOIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

124

25%

LEVEL 3

153

31%

LEVEL 4

157

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

61

13%

LEVEL 2

93

19%

LEVEL 3

135

28%

LEVEL 4

195

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

169
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

88

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

118

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

69

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

77

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

10

63%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

68
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

39

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

41

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

212
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

53

15%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

107

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

234
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

67

20%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

137

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

12

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

107

24%

LEVEL 3

150

33%

LEVEL 4

155

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

79

18%

LEVEL 3

125

29%

LEVEL 4

194

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

28

56%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

24

49%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

289
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

139

32%

LEVEL 4

150

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

75

18%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

182

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

17

28%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

20

30%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.