Skip to Content
Main content

CORINTH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

143

29%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

136

27%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

149

29%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

134

26%

LEVEL 4

60

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

59

24%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

84

34%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

95

37%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

135

29%

LEVEL 2

165

35%

LEVEL 3

132

28%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

143

29%

LEVEL 2

169

34%

LEVEL 3

129

26%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

162

36%

LEVEL 3

135

30%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

114

24%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

133

29%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

36

78%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

35

69%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

86

37%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

83

35%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

103

39%

LEVEL 2

97

37%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

105

38%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

178
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

141

29%

LEVEL 2

168

34%

LEVEL 3

133

27%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

188
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

148

29%

LEVEL 2

171

34%

LEVEL 3

128

25%

LEVEL 4

60

12%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

180
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

132

28%

LEVEL 2

164

34%

LEVEL 3

135

28%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

190
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

146

29%

LEVEL 2

172

34%

LEVEL 3

131

26%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.