Skip to Content
Main content

NORWOOD-NORFOLK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

143

33%

LEVEL 2

162

38%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

137

32%

LEVEL 2

155

36%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

53

24%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

84

40%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

140

34%

LEVEL 2

152

37%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

135

33%

LEVEL 2

150

36%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

79

23%

LEVEL 2

144

42%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

139

40%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

64

74%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

59

76%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

114

42%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

114

43%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

141

33%

LEVEL 2

159

38%

LEVEL 3

93

22%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

131
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

131

32%

LEVEL 2

151

37%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.