Skip to Content
Main content

GOUVERNEUR CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

242

46%

LEVEL 2

179

34%

LEVEL 3

83

16%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

339

52%

LEVEL 2

204

31%

LEVEL 3

85

13%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

91

37%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

151

55%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

199

60%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

32

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

237

47%

LEVEL 2

175

34%

LEVEL 3

77

15%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

332

52%

LEVEL 2

201

32%

LEVEL 3

83

13%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

180

40%

LEVEL 2

170

38%

LEVEL 3

79

18%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

257

46%

LEVEL 2

196

35%

LEVEL 3

83

15%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

62

83%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

82

89%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

66

34%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

176

53%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

102
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

237

46%

LEVEL 2

176

34%

LEVEL 3

82

16%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

104
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

330

52%

LEVEL 2

199

31%

LEVEL 3

84

13%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

98
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

235

47%

LEVEL 2

171

34%

LEVEL 3

79

16%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

101
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

333

53%

LEVEL 2

200

32%

LEVEL 3

83

13%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

101
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

226

45%

LEVEL 2

178

35%

LEVEL 3

81

16%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

106
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

322

51%

LEVEL 2

198

32%

LEVEL 3

85

14%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

16

84%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

17

74%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.