PEARL RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

109

26%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

117

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

108

24%

LEVEL 3

122

27%

LEVEL 4

146

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

78

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

89

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

12

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

201
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

94

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

118

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

22

30%

LEVEL 4

14

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

35

9%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

127

33%

LEVEL 4

116

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

97

24%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

145

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

29

69%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

32

65%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

249
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

108

26%

LEVEL 3

132

32%

LEVEL 4

117

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

267
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

65

15%

LEVEL 2

105

24%

LEVEL 3

121

28%

LEVEL 4

146

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

127

35%

LEVEL 4

107

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

128

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

20

35%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

16

26%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

18

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

247
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

132

32%

LEVEL 4

115

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

264
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

107

24%

LEVEL 3

119

27%

LEVEL 4

145

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.