HAVERSTRAW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

153

47%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

187

49%

LEVEL 2

112

30%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

62

41%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

72

41%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

91

52%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

115

57%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

28

39%

LEVEL 2

29

40%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

41

53%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

113

53%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

132

54%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

131

44%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

164

48%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

23

68%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

73
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

79

32%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

80
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

100

35%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

74

89%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

87

90%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

37

41%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

133

56%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

158

57%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.