LANSINGBURGH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 904

LEVEL 1

366

40%

LEVEL 2

280

31%

LEVEL 3

194

21%

LEVEL 4

64

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,017

LEVEL 1

397

39%

LEVEL 2

306

30%

LEVEL 3

217

21%

LEVEL 4

97

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

134

33%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

134

29%

LEVEL 2

157

34%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

232

46%

LEVEL 2

149

30%

LEVEL 3

99

20%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

263

47%

LEVEL 2

149

27%

LEVEL 3

107

19%

LEVEL 4

37

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

34
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

46

46%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

42

44%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

178

34%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

122

24%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

219

37%

LEVEL 2

169

28%

LEVEL 3

141

24%

LEVEL 4

66

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

81

50%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

73

40%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

59

50%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

60

45%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 751

LEVEL 1

249

33%

LEVEL 2

248

33%

LEVEL 3

190

25%

LEVEL 4

64

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 831

LEVEL 1

249

30%

LEVEL 2

276

33%

LEVEL 3

209

25%

LEVEL 4

97

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

117

76%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

148

80%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

255
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 879

LEVEL 1

351

40%

LEVEL 2

273

31%

LEVEL 3

191

22%

LEVEL 4

64

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

312
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 996

LEVEL 1

383

38%

LEVEL 2

301

30%

LEVEL 3

215

22%

LEVEL 4

97

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

63

25%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 685

LEVEL 1

304

44%

LEVEL 2

222

32%

LEVEL 3

125

18%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 765

LEVEL 1

334

44%

LEVEL 2

237

31%

LEVEL 3

135

18%

LEVEL 4

59

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

253
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 889

LEVEL 1

359

40%

LEVEL 2

277

31%

LEVEL 3

190

21%

LEVEL 4

63

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

301
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 955

LEVEL 1

366

38%

LEVEL 2

288

30%

LEVEL 3

207

22%

LEVEL 4

94

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

31

50%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.