Skip to Content
Main content

TEMPLE HILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

125

20%

LEVEL 2

223

35%

LEVEL 3

181

28%

LEVEL 4

110

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

133

21%

LEVEL 2

197

32%

LEVEL 3

213

34%

LEVEL 4

81

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

115

37%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

79

24%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

22

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

33

44%

LEVEL 4

15

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

36

28%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

166
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

75

19%

LEVEL 2

144

37%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

168
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

75

20%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

128

34%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

67

12%

LEVEL 2

194

36%

LEVEL 3

175

32%

LEVEL 4

105

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

79

15%

LEVEL 2

165

31%

LEVEL 3

206

39%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

58

59%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

54

57%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

277
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

167

32%

LEVEL 3

167

32%

LEVEL 4

110

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

284
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

94

18%

LEVEL 2

157

29%

LEVEL 3

203

38%

LEVEL 4

81

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

50

42%

LEVEL 2

56

47%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

39

44%

LEVEL 2

40

45%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

38

37%

LEVEL 4

35

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

38

40%

LEVEL 4

22

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

116

22%

LEVEL 2

201

38%

LEVEL 3

143

27%

LEVEL 4

75

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

121

23%

LEVEL 2

175

33%

LEVEL 3

175

33%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

280
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

109

18%

LEVEL 2

209

35%

LEVEL 3

174

29%

LEVEL 4

106

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

280
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

119

20%

LEVEL 2

184

32%

LEVEL 3

199

34%

LEVEL 4

81

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

14

34%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.