ENDERS ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

126

52%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

127

53%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

69

56%

LEVEL 4

41

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

66

56%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

57

48%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

61

50%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

15

50%

LEVEL 4

12

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

15

58%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

105

55%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

101

53%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

120

52%

LEVEL 4

63

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

120

53%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

112

51%

LEVEL 4

61

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

122

56%

LEVEL 4

40

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

14

56%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

165
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

123

52%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.